Context
A hostile-context trial tested whether repeated phrasing would be mistaken for independent support.
VIS-LANG-01BOUNDED TESTMethod note
When Repetition Looks Like Corroboration
Repeated language can appear independent while still descending from one provenance root.
Governing rule
Frequency is not corroboration when the copies share a source.
Current state
The explicit test passed, but durable provenance behavior across interfaces remains unproven.
Current evidence
What the record supports.
- Hostile-context cases
- 12 / 12
- Shared provenance was made explicit
- Repeated language was not counted as independent support
- Workflow behavior passed the bounded prompt
Public evidence files
Inspect the record.
Public-safe derivatives only. Source availability does not broaden the claim stated on this page.
Claim boundary
What remains unearned.
- One prompt does not prove durable behavior
- No implicit-attribution claim
- No cross-system provenance guarantee
Next evidence
Reproduce the behavior across fresh sessions and interface boundaries.